If you've done any kind of social justice study, you've probably heard of, if not read, Jonathan Kozol. Over the last 40-ish years he's written a number of excellent and important books on the underserved, overlooked and otherwise dispossessed of our society, including
Amazing Grace,
Ordinary Ressurections,
Death at an Early Age, and
Rachel and her Children. I first read his work two years ago, on a dreary break from school when I found myself cooped up in my barracks-style apartment with nothing much to do and nothing new to read. Wandering between the apartment's two rooms, I happened on a stack of my sister's sociology texts, and picked the one that looked least dry. It turned out to be
Savage Inequalities, a searing indictment of the United States' segregated public school system. It was one of those books that didn't tell you anything new, per se, just forced you to look at an uncomfortable problem very long, and very hard. It is one thing to acknowledge that schools in poor, largely minority areas are "worse" than schools in affluent white areas. It is quite another to realize what that really means, every day, for the students of those schools. How can you read about schools with sewage leaks, schools without books or desks, schools located in abandoned, windowless rollerskating rinks, without anger and disgust welling up inside, without being angry with
yourself for having nothing to give but hand-wringing and tears? It was while reading this book that I remember, for the first time, thinking,
I shouldn't be teaching English in Africa or Asia. I am needed here. The last Kozol I read was
Amazing Grace. I carried it with me while I was going through the district hiring process, which, much like a DMV appointment, can involve hours of patiently waiting in flourescent-lit rooms full of the irate unemployed. A colleague glanced at my book and, spying its subtitle -
The Lives of Children and the Conscience of a Nation - told me it was an appropriate choice. This subtitle is dead-on for what we do in The Program: it's about education, yes, but moreover, it's about realizing that in our society as it is currently structured, education can determine the rest of your life - and about having the conscience to act on that realization. My colleague asked if it was worth reading. I told her yes, and also that I read Kozol when I have trouble getting mad. Because really, it's amazing how quickly we become inured to the injustices of society. Those of us from Berkeley are familiar with the cycle: at first you're shocked by the amount of homelessness you see, and you want to help, but you soon start to feel powerless. As time passes, that apathy changes to avoidance, and you shift your eyes away from their gaze; you tell yourself you need your change as much or more than they do. Eventually you become irritated with them - begging all the time, smelling so foul, sitting in your way when you're trying to get to class. You can fight these feelings, but if you don't, they can sneak up on you and catch you unawares.
I have been at my school for just two weeks, and already I am used to it: the lack of bathrooms, the shortage of teachers, the complete absence of keys, the library closed to the students, the "Tardy Sweep" that forces any student late to class to spend the
entire period rotting in detention, the track system that robs them of 21 educational days per year - over the course of a K-12 education placing them one full year behind students on traditional calendars. I don't like these things - I outright despise them - but I am not surprised by them anymore. They have become the status quo.
And then, the other day, I looked in my box in the main office and found a copy of an excerpt from Kozol's new book,
The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. The book comes out in two weeks, but
Harper's Magazine is running a long essay adapted from the text as its September Report. The book was researched over five years, with Kozol visiting 60 schools in 11 states. The Harper's excerpt focuses heavily on mine.
Is this what you call "coming full circle?" Or is it called "getting what you asked for"? I read Kozol and I wanted to teach in
those schools, the ones he talked about. So here I am, suddenly free of any doubt that this is indeed the kind of place he was talking about. He came here, and he talked to our students. And this is what he has to say about our school:
We have fifteen fewer bathrooms than the number required by law.
Bathrooms are so rarely open and operational that students often must go the whole day without using them.
Many rooms lack air conditioners and become so hot that students become sick and cannot focus.
The only vocational classes we offer prepare students for low-paying jobs: cosmetology, sewing, hairdressing.
We in fact offer two levels of hairdressing: hairstyling and braiding.
We force students into these classes, even those who request high-level and AP courses, because academic classes are overcrowded and few.
We force students into classes like "Life Skills," which teach things like the names and locations of the continents.
Rats have been documented in 11 classrooms and the kitchen.
Attending my school teaches students that they are not wanted by society.
All of these things are true.
So here I sit, pissed off at myself, because it is somehow so much easier to get angry about these things when you see them on the page than when you see them every day. Moreover, it is easy to get angry in theory, but to take absolutely no action. I am realizing how many times, already, I have told my students, "I'm sorry, that's just how it is," or, "I don't like it either, but you'll have to bear with me." They come to class hungry as their breaks aren't long enough to purchase food
and eat it, and I am instructed not to let them eat; they spend their brief passing periods in line for the bathroom but never make it in, and I can't send them out because they'll get caught in the infernal Tardy Sweep, regardless of whether I write them a pass. My school is a bit militaristic this way, and completely illogical; they believe that students should be in class learning
at all times, a proposition I agree with wholeheartedly until the student I have sent out for three minutes, to return much happier and more able to focus in my class, is detained and denied the right to return to the classroom for the remainder of the hour.
I remember Program veterans telling me, early on, that you have to decide if your loyalty is to The Program or to your school. I'm realizing that this is something of a false choice. Everyone involved is ostensibly trying to help my students, and "choosing a side" doesn't necessarily do much for me or them one way or the other. In the end, I think, I need to remember (as I always try to) that my loyalty is to my students. Crucially, though, I must act on it. I have students in classes like fashion, cosmetology, and the ubiquitous "Life Skills" (which one of my Program colleagues, interestingly, has been assigned to teach.) I have students taking "soccer" as part of their academic day, and also "filmmaking," which might be great, although I'm not entirely certain we own any kind of filmmaking equipment, and I'm certain students wouldn't be able to take it off-campus. I don't know what I can do about these things, especially in my first year. I do know, though, that I can be the teacher who makes my kids read a few young adult novels in addition to their ESL program, and who pushes my seniors to read tough novels and write long essays no matter what I'm told about what they are and are not capable of. I can start investigating the AP situation, how many we have and what I would have to do to start one up in the coming year and on my track. Our school has some AP classes, but in a school of 5,000 with three separate tracks, there can really never be enough.
Anyhow. The question for me is mostly how to hang on to my anger, and then how to turn that anger into a better life for my students. It would help me, though, if other people would get angry, too, so they might scream at me when it seems like I'm accepting my situation. So, if you can, go to the newsstand or the library and read that Harper's piece. If you are out of country, it may take awhile for the expat bookstores to get this month's issue, if they stock Harper's at all, and I certainly don't expect you to buy the thing at import cost - but maybe you could keep an eye out, too, and read the thing on the sly. I could even mail photocopies, if people were interested. As for me, I'll be buying the book when it comes out. The reality is that sometimes it's easier for me to believe what's in black and white than what's all around me every day. No one wants to believe they're surrounded by misery.